Start with what you want to do

A telescope that is outstanding for one of these can be genuinely unsuitable for another. Every score, verdict and comparison on this site is written against one of them at a time.

Visual observing

What actually matters when you want to look through a telescope — aperture, contrast, mount stability, ergonomics and the far less glamorous question of whether it gets carried outside.

What decides it

  • Aperture
  • Optical contrast
  • Mount stability

Deep-sky astrophotography

An overview of deep-sky imaging and why nebulae and galaxies demand almost opposite telescopes — plus the uncomfortable truth that the mount usually matters more than the optics.

What decides it

  • The mount, before the telescope
  • Focal length against target size
  • Focal ratio

Nebula imaging

Focal ratio, field of view, corrected image circle and sensor compatibility — what actually decides whether a telescope can photograph large emission and reflection nebulae.

What decides it

  • Focal ratio
  • Field of view
  • Corrected image circle

Galaxy imaging

Image scale, focal length, aperture, seeing limits, guiding accuracy and field correction — what decides whether a telescope can resolve structure in a small galaxy.

What decides it

  • Focal length and image scale
  • Aperture and resolving power
  • Seeing

Planetary imaging

Aperture, long focal length, sampling, seeing, collimation, thermal management and high-frame-rate capture — what actually produces sharp images of the Moon and planets.

What decides it

  • Aperture
  • Long native focal length
  • Optical quality and contrast